The exact requirements that you have should dictate the exact choice of the hard drives you will go with. However, after the amalgamation of Green drives with the Blue range of drives, you can get capacities up to 6 TB. Product Comparison: Western Digital Red Pro vs Seagate IronWolf Pro. Get a reputable drive meant for the job at hand. A year where (almost) everything is perfect, then a year with a 3+% return rate under warranty. The IronWolf NAS models deliver slightly better performance compared to the WD Red due to the 7200RPM nature, but, have correspondingly higher power consumption numbers. The discs have been planned to offer a streamlined mix of high capacity, faster speeds in terms of sequential read and write operations. While sustaining itself in the market with several options, the company has been a good choice for computer storages since the 1970s. When in use, the temperature of WD Red sits between 32F to 149F. The new NAS-centric solid-state drive proved to be faster than its rival in my testing. However, the WD Red … Simply put, the WD Blue should be an ideal option for the basic desktop applications like web browsing and documents. You will also find that they are the most affordable options for your requirement. When you pair IronWolf and 4TB+ capacities of IronWolf & IronWolf Pro, you get an extra baked in drive monitoring feature that extends beyond traditional S.M.A.R.T monitoring, dubbed IHM (IronWolf Health Management). I recently had a 4TB IronWolf totally die within a few weeks of commisioning, and it was replaced by the store. A NAS server experiences sporadic and random performances concerning reads and writes of applications. You will also find less chance of getting a refurb, like you would with a WD Red. Se il tuo scopo fosse la velocità delle operazioni di I/O o di caricamento del sistema operativo, potresti rivolgerti ad un hard disk SSD oggi presenti sul mercato. Furthermore, while we don’t yet have Seagate’s IronWolf 110 NAS SSD, if you compare the two, WD’s Red SA500 is significantly less expensive, but then again, the Red doesn’t offer the … Conventional drives are made for personal use where only one user accesses it at a time, whereas NAS storage drives are more capable as they handle entire group or groups of users at the same time. Western Digital achieved parity with the launch of the second generation WD Red models yesterday. Thus, Seagate is a winner once again here. Not sure what the issue is it just says smart status failing. Advertiser Disclosure. Let us check out which purposes do the WD RED, and WD Blue hard drives serve? WD RED lives up to the expectations in those circumstances. Backup, archiving and disaster recovery functions, Compatible with on-premise private cloud and virtual storage. The Seagate IronWolf series is the company's solution for NAS setups, rivaling the Western Digital Red, but with faster speeds and larger storage capacities available. They have multiple hard drive options aimed at different user groups and equip them with specific features and functionalities. WD Red Vs. Seagate Ironwolf? This server is connected to a network that allows multiple levels of user access to the data that is stored on NAS simultaneously using the network layer. Today, we will attempt understanding the differences between the WD Blue and WD Red and check the specifications that they come with. While Seagate Ironwolf Pro is already in the lead, it comes with free data recovery software, giving it even further edge. Hey OP. Shock tolerance while operating and while the ideal is nearly similar for both of the hard disk drives. I don't think either brand is terrible. It is not specified for Seagate, but you can expect it to be more as the spindle speed is high. The slack employee who sneezed too often has moved to another job. Based on pure specs, simply put, Seagate Ironwolf Pro outlasts Western Digital Red in every possible aspect when it comes to speed and performance. These drives come with a three-year warranty as opposed to the two-year warranty on the WD Blue hard drives. From among a host of options that Western Digital offers you, it may be a little difficult to understand the exact difference between the differences between each of these options. They are one of the best hard drives regarding sales for Western Digital. They offer you only two-speed options – 5400 rpm and 7200 rpm. These drives come with 3D Active Balance Plus which lets you use up to eight WD Red drives in a NAS enabled system. The 2TB version of WD's Red NAS range of hard drives has a performance profile that is similar to that of its larger 3TB sibling. I'm considering the ds416j for ease of use and found it online at warehouse 1 – cost with 4 x 3tb wd red is $1025. It spins faster but is also a little noisier. Copyright All rights reserved, Best NAS Storage Drive: WD Red vs Seagate Ironwolf Spec Comparison, on Best NAS Storage Drive: WD Red vs Seagate Ironwolf Spec Comparison, WD SE vs WD Red Pro Specifications Comparison, WD Red vs WD Gold vs WD SE Enterprise NAS Storage, List of the Best Budget Laptops with Intel Core™ i5-10210U Processor, Xiaomi Amazfit T Rex vs GTR vs Stratos 3 – Specs Comparison, Budget LGA 1200 Motherboards – Intel Z490 for Core i5 10600K 10500K, Fix and Resolve Error Band is paired by other person Ask them to unpair it and try again, How to Connect Pair and Reset MI Band 2 In Android, How to Connect Your Jiofi Device To PC Using Through USB Tethering, How to Configure Yahoo Mail in Microsoft Outlook 2016, Best Budget B550 Motherboards For Ryzen 2 CPUs – 3600XT 3800XT, 3 years of limited warranty from the manufacturer, 6.4/5.2 (8TB), 5.3/3.4 (6TB, 5TB), 4.5/3.3 (4TB), 4.1/2.7 (3TB, 2TB), 3.3/2.3 (1TB), 1.4/0.6 (1TB 2.5”, 750GB 2.5”), 5.3/3.4 (6TB, 5TB, 4TB), 4.1/3.0 (3TB, 2TB), 3.3/2.5 (1TB @5400RPM), 6.8/6.1 (, Designed for use in a NAS system supporting up to 8 bays/storage drives at once, 24×7 availability, NAS firmware compatibility, ideal for 24×7 working environments, Does not need / ships with mounting hardware, if the NAS system requires a mounting device, they are available for purchase separately, Delivers fantastic compatibility and performance with NAS-ware 3.0, Remains cool in most of the situations, sturdy build with vibration proof protection, On drive balance with agile array technology, power management with NAS enclosure, error data recovery control, RAID optimization, Compatible with NAS systems with 1 to 16 bays, rotational vibration sensors, consistent performance in multi-bay NAS systems with mitigating vibration, Up to 12 TB of storage with 300 TB / year workload capacity, ideal for multi-user access/environment, 2 million hours MTBF. Since Seagate is more performance and speeds intensive, its temperature varies between 41F to 158F while in operation. Mainly, NAS storage is used where you need to serve files to various users over SMB 3.0 or a web user interface. WD’s Red SA500 NAS SSD is a direct response to Seagate’s IronWolf 110, but with its lower cost-per-GB, it is a much better value for those who don’t need extreme write … If the hard drive you choose tends to buckle under such loads, you may end up with huge performance issues. Till then, see you in the next one! Been through more drives, and more vendors, than I can remember. What benefits does the integration have? What … So I am looking for a new drive. I switched to hgst and never looked back. We are here to give you good advise. Ideally, they are the best options for the primary drive applications and essential gaming performances. Worth every extra penny that they cost. Reds. When you need the massive amount of storage, you can go with Seagate Ironwolf Pro as it has bigger storage capacities up to 12 GB. A few days ago, someone posted this report which I found very helpful: Before we dig into a WD Red vs Seagate Ironwolf product comparison, we will discuss some of its use cases. WD red or seagate ironwolf which is the better drive. If you’re looking at a larger drive, you might be interested that the Wolf offers 7200RPM at 6tb and higher, whereas you have to get the Red Pro for that in the WD range. In the case of these products, WD comes with three years of limited warranty. The WD drives have a lower price range, offer you only two-year warranty options and a maximum capacity of up to  1 TB. Today, we will be discussing two NAS hard disk drives from the world’s leading storage solution providers: Western Digital and Seagate. Wanted WD Red or Seagate Ironwolf NAS HDD. External data transfer rate is the same for both the drive [probably the same for all latest hard drive models] that is 600 MB/s. The tabulated comparison between the two hard drive types will ensure that we will be able to understand the exact features that each of these options offers you. That 9 day and almost 14-hour rebuild means that using the WD Red 4TB SMR drive inadvertently in an array would lead to your data being vulnerable for around 9 days longer than the WD Red 4TB CMR drive or Seagate IronWolf. and yes, 9GB is not a typo :). This will translate into lesser power draw and less heat. Western Digital has been one of the most popular manufacturers of Hard Drives and SSDs. Storage Management WD Red Vs. Seagate Ironwolf? We will compare the two hard drive types based on a few key parameters –. Every vendor has good runs and bad runs. They are designed to withstand the challenges posed by the NAS environments that need you to have an always-on functionality. And they run significantly hotter than 5200/5900rpm drives. However, if you are looking for outclassing performance and speed and if you are ready to chip out some extra cash, Seagate Ironwolf Pro should be your first option. Now I'm looking to buy a new 4TB hdd and … The larger the buffer cache your drive has, the faster it will perform. I remember when Seagate was bad. The factory has been cleaned. It is simple. That was all we have concerning the comparison between the WD Red and WD Blue hard drives and their specific application areas. Toggle Dropdown. That would mean it should be up to you as to which among them would you want to go with. We will come back with more informative stuff. WD Blue is one of the most commonly used hard drives from Western Digital. The same thing has happened with WD … Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. I've been buying drives for over 30 years. Samsung. Here is how: WD Red has the spindle speed of … As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. The buffer cache merely is an embedded memory that keeps the hard disk and the computer system in the buffer. WD support is good. Most … Share your experiences and opinions with the best of the Western Digital hard drives with us through the comments section here below. The WD Red SA500 SSD is Western Digital’s formidable contender to Seagate’s IronWolf 110. I had one go bad in 5 years, simply stuck my spare in m NAS and did an RMA - now that one sits as my spare. WD Red Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. Since they were established, both Western Digital and Seagate have built trust among the consumers with their best quality products and excellent service and support. The IronWolf Pro is the direct competitor to the Red … It is different than the wd red drives? in two weeks I lost one Seagate Ironwolf and 1 WD Red (3 years old). It can be one of the best options for the non-mission critical PC functions. One of the most popular options among the products from the WD rainbow, the WD RED can be the best option if you are opting for the NAS server. Hitachi. Maxtor. What is the best drive to get? The WD RED also comes with the support for RAID systems. Here we begin: Following table summarizes all important specs and aspect about the Seagate Ironwolf Pro and Western Digital Red. WD RED is specifically designed hard drive option for the NAS server applications. Sound emission for WD Red is 23 dBA. This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. … five years of warranty includes data recovery plans free for three years, Tough and scalable for NAS. Congratulations, as you have fallen in just the right spot. A few years back I got two Seagate drives and they were highly rated on back blaze. Western Digital 4TB WD Red Plus NAS Internal Hard Drive - 5400 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, CMR, 64 MB Cache, 3.5" - WD40EFRX Seagate BarraCuda 2TB Internal Hard Drive HDD – 2.5 Inch SATA … Run RAID. WD. The drive has Helium, and this ensures that it causes less turbulence and resistance. Go figure. Western Digital 1TB WD Red Plus NAS Internal Hard Drive - 5400 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, CMR, 16 MB Cache, 2.5" - WD10JFCX 4.7 out of 5 stars 395 WD 10TB Elements Desktop Hard Drive HDD, … WD comes in smaller units which is ideal when your application is on a limited scale. WD Red drives are one of the best options for all your specific requirements concerning high-end applications. The discs are made available in capacities up to 8 TB. The IronWolf base model competes head to head with Western Digital's Red (base series) that still uses the 5,900-RPM spindle speed. Western Digital has been attempting to merge both the Green and Blue range of hard drives into a single Blue range of hard drives. Most people stick to the brand they started out with unless they've had massive problems. They can also be a good option for the basic level of media consumption. Thread starter t4ure4n; Start date Jan 2, 2021; Tags hdd nas seagate wanted wd red western digital T. t4ure4n Active Member. They both good choices for a NAS, however I personally prefer WD Red… The WD Red Pro also has a higher potential cache than the IronWolf Pro, which allows the drive to access frequently used files faster. The drives are quite fast considering and the capacity is excellent. The higher end SATA DAS/NAS storage segments have been served by 4 TB models for … volevo sapere quale HDD sia meglio abbinare tra: Seagate Iron wolf e Western Digital Red come taglio di storage penso di stare o su 4 o su 6tb cadauno ma molto dipenderà anche dal … Something happened to the batch and there was a30% failure rate per year on that one batch of drives. Hard disk drives meant for NAS storage are different from traditional hard disk drives in many ways. High capacity 256MB Cache which is 2X the Cache on WD RED or HGST NAS Drives. The difference is clear, isn’t it? Since you have landed on this page, we assume that you are looking for the best NAS storage solution based on its quality and durability. The WD Blue range of hard drives is not suitable if you are looking for advanced features like TLER for RAIP based applications. Syquest. Affiliate Disclosure: is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. As the table above shows, MTBF for WD Red is 1000000 hours, and for Ironwolf Pro, it is 1200000 hours. If you are a home user, you can go with the budget range of drives, while the enterprise users can opt for the more expensive highly endowed alternatives. Before we start discussing their pros and cons and comparing them, let us first understand what NAS storage really is: Before we delve into the detailed specs of each, let us clarify the basics. lol; reading your post made me recall in the old days having to set jumpers on the hard drives :( not a good memory lol. As you can see, WD Red is available up to 8 GB, whereas Seagate Ironwolf Pro provides up to 12 GB of storage. IronWolf drives >= 8TB are 7200rpm. And Maxtor. The WD40EFAX is the only SMR drive in the comparison and is the focus of the testing. So I am looking for a new drive. Which among those had drive types have you opted for? With an average read speed of 108 MB/s the 2TB Red … Network attached storage or NAS is a file-level data-storage server. Since these drives are not your regular desktop disks, it is essential to understand its use. Our Verdict. Fast drive with all that … X. The hard drives have been made specifically for this purpose. WD Blue is the hard drive from the Western Digital stable that caters mostly to the home users. The choice is going to be simple for you, if your application is on the smaller scale, you can go either for Red or Ironwolf pro, as both of them offer small units including 1 TB, 2 TB, 3 TB, 4 TB, etc. Le prestazioni sono infatti di ottimo livello se comparate ad altri modelli del settore NAS, come i WD Red… Not sure what the issue is it just says smart status failing. It is obvious, whenever we talk about storage drives, Seagate and Western Digital are the only names that are much likely come up. Got two failures right off the bat. If you have read this far, you may have understood very well that Seagate Ironwolf Pro is entirely in a different class compared to Western Digital Red. So as you can see, Seagate Pro wins here, without change for WD Red. Have a look here: Let us quickly summarize what the table represents: The form factor of both drives is same that is 3.5” x 1/3H, and both of them are designed for network attached storages, making them a good alternative to each other. The funny thing, by the time the statistics are gathered and analyzed, you are one or two years down the line, and you are onto a new run. The drives are designed for everyday usage. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, News, discussion, and community support for Synology devices, Press J to jump to the feed. As mentioned before, we are going to compare the top NAS drives from Seagate and Western Digital. Both drives lag behind the group average significantly in terms of overall performance. Thus, we have picked the best NAS hard drive storage solution provided by these two brands. Both use sub-branding for their product offerings, and they are as follows: To make things easier for our readers, we will begin with a side by side comparison, and then discuss what the various advantages (or disadvantages) of these drives are. So, now that you understand exactly how these NAS drives differ from traditional hard drives let us jump to the main topic of the discussion. Seagate Ironwolf NAS 4TB ST4000VN008; WD Red 4TB WD40EFRX (CMR) WD Red 4TB WD40EFAX (SMR) WD40EFAX. And it moves from vendor to vendor, as if some mischievous sprite flitted from factory to factory, vendor to vendor. Like it has already made clear through the above discussion, the WD Red hard drives have been considered to be an excellent option for the NAS environments. Based on pure specs, simply put, Seagate Ironwolf Pro outlasts Western Digital Red in every possible aspect when it comes to speed and performance. In sharp contrast, the quieter workstation requirements will need you to go with the WD Red as a preferred option. These drives are not for general purpose storage. So I have a drive failing, it is a WD Red. 10 ^ 15 is higher than 10 ^ 14. It’s whisper quiet and the shock protection is great too, There is plenty of information about the temperature and load averages, The hard drive comes with an authentication code, There has been a … Seagate Ironwolf Pro is backed with five years of limited warranty. However, this does not mean that Western Digital Red is a bad NAS storage, not at all. When it comes to internal data rate, Seagate Ironwolf Pro as 210 MB/s speed where WD Red has 147 MB/s. WD Red is built for limited scale application where Ironwolf Pro is developed for large-scale applications with high performance and speed. The more MTBF, the better it is. The hard drive may not be a good option if you are dealing with a RAID environment. So I have a drive failing, it is a WD Red. I think everyone is taking your comment to mean "buy the cheapest drive you can find on Craigslist" where I think you actually mean buy the cheapest of the two from the OP? It is quite considerable as it delivers better performance compared to the former one. I've also found the ds416j with 4 x Ironwolf 4TB ST4000VN008 hard drives for $1099. If your use is limited and your budget is strict, WD Red is always an excellent choice. Moreover, WD red has 64 MB of buffer cache where Ironwolf Pro has 256 MB of the buffer cache. I ended up opting to still go for the red as evidently media streaming doesn’t benefit from 7200, but it will chew up more power! They are the faster options for the performance. Like we stated already, Western Digital offers you specific application areas for each of its multiple hard drive options. Moreover, their service includes free data recovery meaning that you would not need to pay for data recovery if anything goes wrong with the drive. Yeah, back into the early 80s. Toshiba. The side by side comparison between the two hard drive types will help us pinpoint the differences between the two options. Apr 03, 2019 2 Replies 4083 Views 1 Likes. Testing the WD Red … Are the Ironwolf HDD comparable to the WD Red … But Ironwolf is a newer drive that doesn't have the issues more than any other drive model. The first one was replaced since it was still warranty, but the WD red is not. If you use WD Red CMR drives, you had class-leading performance in this test but if you bought a WD Red … One of the most cost-effective and budget drives coming from WD, the drive suits all your basic requirements. Mean time between failures [MTBF] is the average time in which a failure is likely to occur in hard disk storage under intensive loads. Just like Skyhawk is meant for surveillance hard drives, these hard-drives are meant for NAS based storage. We are passionate Tech Bloggers from the Industry with years of consulting experience. ive seen more reds fail then wolfs but others will say different. The hard drive offers you both low-level usage and long life functionality. edit: Get whichever of those two drives, the WD Red or Seagate IronWolf, is cheapest. IBM. IME IronWolf 4TB drives run cooler than older WD Red 3TB drives. Late 1990s - expensive high-end Dell Workstation and 9GB SCSI drive; making a lovely SCSI hard drive sound which was rather nice sounding. We hope, this comparison will help you to choose the right product for you according to your application and requirements. Keep a spare onsite or have quick access to one. Seagate Technology | Official Forums Team. You can't beat that drive. Yeah tried that. I deploy nothing but Seagate Iron Wolf and am glad for the integration Synology has with those drives. Red Pros are probably not worth the extra $ for home use. On and on. Consistently quieter in operation and affordable at best, they are an excellent option for your home based low level needs like basic browsing and similar other options. Affordability is one of the areas that has made it a preferred alternative among a host of other service providers. Here is how: WD Red has the spindle speed of 5400 RPM where Ironwolf pro has the spindle speed of 7200 RPM. Moreover, the nonrecoverable errors occur once per 10 ^ 14 errors in WD Red, and for Seagate Ironwolf Pro it happens once for 10 ^ 15. Rating - … The hard drives are designed for quieter and lower power consumption. First off, we just want to say thanks for considering Seagate, regardless of which route you decide is the best fit for your needs in the end. J. Jacob Weinstein @jacobweins. Western Digital, commonly referred to as WD has been a well known hard drive manufacturer (they are also into SSDs) and incidentally one of the preferred options leaving aside Seagate. 70+ WD 5400rpm Reds in production 24/7 and we've had 1 failure in 3 years. I spent a fair bit of time debating between the two and there were very limited differences, so I ended up with the Red.